The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has suggested which movies of 2016 are the best. The result for me is that I am less interested in this Oscar cast that I have been since Driving Miss Daisy nabbed the top prize in a snoozer of a ceremony.This is a down year for me. There are many good films here, but none that I would term great. I doubt that there are any classics here, and I also don’t think that the Academy overlooked any hidden or underappreciated gems. Simply put, I think there were slim pickings in 2016.
Still, this is a
task I take on, so here is how I rank the nine nominated films, in descending
order. These are not my predictions, but my estimation of their innovation, uniquely
cinematic quality, and overall excellence. I have often stated that I follow
the Roger Ebert rule. I think the best film of a given year should make me look
at cinema differently. Only one film did that for me in 2016.
By the way, there is
one common positive element among all the nominated films this year: The acting
is really good, not just among the Oscar nominees, but throughout all the
casts. It used to be said that film is a director’s medium while the stage
belongs to actors. But this year’s crop of performances must have been hard to
pare down. Bravo to all.
So here goes.
How Did That One
Get In?
9. Lion — This movie has all the earmarks
of Oscar bait: A pathetic child. Let’s elaborate on that: Make that “a pathetic
child who is separated from parents.” Heart-rending absences. Climax of an inevitable and predictable
closing. (I won’t detail the closing because I don’t want you to say I spoiled
it for you. But if you operate on a mental level above Forrest Gump’s, you’ll
see it coming a mile away.) The plot of
this two-hour film could have been told in about 40 minutes. Instead, it is
padded with B reel of train rides, Google Earth looking down on terrains, and
faces filled with longing. While I am happy to see Dev Patel get an overdue
acting nomination, Lion is the Filomena of 2017, a cloying film that
breaks no cinematic or scriptwriting ground, but instead relies on sentimental clichés.
Worthy
Competitors
8. Fences —Denzel Washington’s challenge
in directing Fences was to free it
from its stage origins. While the film is still more talky and “stagey” than you
want a film to be, Washington triumphs in the raw emotion he conveys, thanks to
the wonderful performances he elicits from his skilled cast. Yes, let’s just
hand Viola Davis her Oscar now. What you’ve heard is correct; she IS that great
as long-suffering Rose, wife of protagonist Troy Maxson. Washington himself is
terrific in the lead, and given his recent Screen Actors Guild award, I predict
he will win Best Actor. They are both ably supported by a fine cast, including Stephen
McKinley Henderson, Jovan Adepo, Russell Hornsby and Mykelti Williamson. August
Wilson’s Pulitzer Prize –winning play (which he adapted for this movie) has
created a new Death of a Salesman,
replete with anguish, disillusionment and betrayal. Washington has honored Mr. Wilson’s
work with this adaptation.
7. Moonlight — I admire much about this freshman
effort from director Barry Jenkins. The autobiographical story of its main
character, Chiron, is moving as the young man gropes for his place in the world.
Moonlight is also filled with
terrific performances, particularly Naomie Harris as Chiron’s crack-addicted
mother and Mahershala Ali as the neighborhood drug dealer who mentors the boy.
That Jenkins could shoot his film so quickly and so quickly and have it turn a
profit is remarkable. However, I found that its torpid third act, which goes
nowhere for the longest time, killed the momentum built to that point. I expect
a well-deserved Oscar for Ali, who is charismatically electrifying in every
frame he fills. I also foresee an undeserved adapted screenplay award to
Jenkins and Tarell Alvin McCraney. I predict that in a few years we will wonder
what the hubbub of this film was about.
6. Hacksaw Ridge — This film tells the
dramatic story of Desmond Doss, a conscientious objector during The Good War
who ends up winning the Congressional Medal of Honor, not by killing a single
enemy soldier but by saving 75 fellow soldiers. I found Hacksaw
Ridge to be the most technically accomplished film of all nine nominees.
Its cinematography, production design, editing and special effects are superb. Though
the film is a little long, director Mel Gibson still manages to navigate the narrative
skillfully. Along the way he gets fine performances from his actors, your
typical Hollywood cast of ethnic and temperamental misfits who come together
(predictably) on the battlefield. Andrew Garfield does a fine job of bringing
Doss’s unlikely story to life. It is a story well worth telling, and Doss is a man
who deserves to be remembered. I am grateful for Hacksaw Ridge.
5. Hidden Figures —Hidden Figures tells the story of three African-American women who worked
for NASA during the nascent years of the U.S. space program. Katherine G.
Johnson (Taraji P. Henson) is the impossibly brilliant mathematician at the
center of the film. Dorothy Vaughan (Octavia Spencer) takes it upon herself to
guide the space agency into the computer age, wresting control of the behemoth
IBM machine that lands there. Finally, Janelle Monáe is Mary Jackson, fighting
in court to attend a segregated classroom to become an engineer. The
trifurcated story moves gracefully under the skillful direction of Theodore
Melfi. There are cliché moments to be sure (The boss crowbars the sign to a
segregated ladies’ room! The snooty white male mathematician gets his
comeuppance!). Still, even though Hidden
Figures does not always amount to high drama, it typifies Hollywood when
its heart is in the right place.
4. Hell or High Water — Such a pleasure to
see this polished gem get the recognition of Oscar love! Hell or High Water is a fitting morality tale for this era of
resentment against the haves of this country by their victims. Two brothers rob
banks so they can get back the ranch that was once theirs — hitting the very
banks that bilked their family! Solid
performances abound. Chris Pine and Ben Foster as the brothers play two men
searching for justice rather than revenge, with Pine measured and controlled
and Foster like a pop bottle ready to
explode in the hot Texas sun. Jeff Bridges and Gil Birmingham anchor the film
with supporting performances as the sheriff and deputy hunting the criminals. David
Mackenzie shows a real feel for the land and character portrayed in the movie, directing
this film with an economy and focus that wastes not a frame.
3. La La Land —La La Land begins on a Los Angeles off-ramp filled with stalled
cars. Suddenly the drivers dance in one of the most vibrant movie openings ever
filmed. We also meet Sebastian (Ryan Gosling) and Mia (Emma Stone), who are searching
for love and stardom, he as a jazzman, she as an actress. What an opening!
Apparently this film is everyone’s darling, but after this auspicious opening, it moves unevenly, charming at times, but also settling to a snail’s pace. I liked La La Land, but not as much as everyone else seems to, and not even as much as I wanted to. How groundbreaking is a musical that admittedly borrows liberally from past works? Also, Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone kind of sing and dance, but not well enough to anchor a movie like this. I appreciate the chutzpah of making a musical in these grouchy times, but it didn’t make my number 1.
Apparently this film is everyone’s darling, but after this auspicious opening, it moves unevenly, charming at times, but also settling to a snail’s pace. I liked La La Land, but not as much as everyone else seems to, and not even as much as I wanted to. How groundbreaking is a musical that admittedly borrows liberally from past works? Also, Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone kind of sing and dance, but not well enough to anchor a movie like this. I appreciate the chutzpah of making a musical in these grouchy times, but it didn’t make my number 1.
(As a bonus to my
readers, here is a link to a Saturday Night Live sketch that I loved. It
features a suspect being grilled by the police for having the impudence NOT TO
LOVE LA LA LAND! It also helps explain why it didn't make the top of my list.)
2. Manchester by the Sea —Lee Chandler is
a struggling laborer, suffering silently through an untold tragedy (voiced
later in a heartbreaking piece of acting by Michelle Williams). Then Lee is unexpectedly tasked with caring
for his late brother’s son, a role he neither wants nor seems suited to. As we slowly uncover Lee’s character in Kenneth
Lonergan’s moving screenplay, there are no grand heroics. We witness the
quotidian triumphs we achieve in our everyday responsibilities. Some films
eschew cheap sentiment, loud music, and other tricks to move us. Better films earn
our engagement by appealing to our common humanity. Manchester by the Sea is a fine example of the latter, a movie that
seems populated by real people like you and me. (By the way, one negative point
here: I do not get the acclaim for Affleck in the lead. I don’t believe that
moping around with your mouth open constitutes great acting.)
1. Arrival — Roger Ebert once stated that film
directors are “set free from the rules of the physical universe and the
limitations of human actors, and can tell any story his mind can conceive.” This
principle puts Arrival at the top of
my list of the Oscar-nominated films of 2016. I found it to be the entry that
most tested our notions of how to use film not only to tell a story but to
challenge our imaginations.
Arrival is what’s known as “a thinking person’s science fiction
movie.” Sometimes that phrase refers to a movie that is absent special effects
and, worse, dull. But Arrival is perplexing
and complicated, and it is also surprisingly moving. The story begins when spaceships
from an unknown, unnamed planet land at seemingly random spots around the
world. A group of linguists, including Louise Banks (Amy Adams) is gathered to
determine how to communicate with these aliens. What is their mission? Are they
on earth in peace or to conquer us?
To complicate
matters for us, the viewer, director Denis Villeneuve has the film jump back
and forth in time and place, showing Louise with a small child and then a young
adult woman. Is this one and the same person? What is the story here?
I can’t say too much
more so as not to give away the plot. But I will say that I have viewed great
films over the years that use editing to alter our sense of time and place and
also to advance several stories at one time. Examples include the great silent
film, Intolerance, as well as Citizen Kane, Nashville, Crash and Inception.
Villeneuve took a seemingly unfilmable short story and brought it to life on
the big screen, testing our very notion of this temporal world (a key plot
point) as only cinema can.
NOTE: Villeneuve is in the post-production of Blade Runner 20149, the sequel set 30 years after the original. I can’t wait to see what he does with that material.
NOTE: Villeneuve is in the post-production of Blade Runner 20149, the sequel set 30 years after the original. I can’t wait to see what he does with that material.
So once again, I
will take a look at next Sunday’s broadcast, curious to see who wins but not in
very much suspense. I will probably not even be overly engaged. I expect La La Land to take the lion’s share of
the prizes (e.g., best picture, director, actress, probably score and one of
the songs, maybe even best original screenplay). But I am already holding out
to see what is released in the remainder of 2017, hoping for some films that
are a little bit better that this year’s crop.
No comments:
Post a Comment